Mercury Work Group
Phase II Reports >> Pretreatment Manual

Facilities Loadings | Pretreatment Manual | Tech. Identification
Hg Management Guidebook | Mercury Products Database

For more information, contact David Eppstein by email at
deppstein@masco.harvard.edu, or by calling 617-632-2860.

 
3.0 STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE

A facility that experiences a problem complying with sewer discharge limits should develop a plan of action. As mentioned in the previous section, some facilities can achieve compliance with all discharge requirements by implementation of a source reduction program within the facility. For other facilities, a source reduction program must be combined with a wastewater pretreatment system to achieve compliance.

While no one plan of action to achieve compliance will be appropriate for all facilities or situations, the following generic step-by-step approach may be considered. The approach is depicted in Figure 1, Ten Steps Toward Industrial Wastewater Discharge Compliance. The first eight steps of the generic approach can be considered source reduction activities.

As shown in Figure 1, the first step is to study the possible pollutant sources within the facility. Each process activity should be examined for chemical or reagent usage and discharge. Verifying and quantifying pollutant sources (Step 2) can sometimes be completed by contacting the chemical or reagent manufacturers and reviewing their product data.

Tracking pathways of pollutants within the facility (Step 3) can involve the facility architectural design drawings and can be assisted by the development of flow diagrams for each industrial process and the building waste piping systems. Targeted monitoring to find pollutant pathways in the facility (Step 4) can require the installation and use of sampling ports in waste piping systems at points upstream of the final regulated discharge location. Information generated by the targeted monitoring can be fed back to Step 3 to help track pollutant pathways and further back to Step 1 to supplement the inventory of known pollutant sources.

With the information generated, candidate source reduction options can be developed and investigated (Step 5). The source reduction options that are found to offer good pollutant reductions and cost savings should be implemented. Since certain source reduction actions may require changes to current operating procedures, employee training might be needed for effective and continuing implementation of these actions (Step 6). Experiences gained from the training program can feed the further development of source reduction options (Step 5).

In addition to such source reduction activities, it may be appropriate to conduct a wastewater characterization study (Step 7) to more fully define the nature of the wastewater being discharged. The results of the study can be used to feed the further development of source reduction options (Step 5) and to define pretreatment requirements and possible interfering pollutants (Step 9). Wastewater characterization is discussed in Section 6.0 of this Manual.

The information derived from pollutant tracking and the wastewater characterization study can be used to identify specific wastestreams that are already meeting discharge standards. Other specific wastestreams might be identified that could cause problems for a specific pretreatment technology. The least cost solution to these situations could be to segregate the complying and problem wastestreams from the main wastewater stream (Step 8). These types of wastestream segregations can favorably affect the size, performance, and cost of the pretreatment system. If implemented, the wastestream segregations may also affect the available source reduction options (Step 5) and the character of the main wastewater stream (Step 7). Coordinating source reduction, source segregation, and pretreatment is discussed in Section 7.0 of this Manual.

Pretreatment technologies can be evaluated and implemented if required (Step 9). The steps of a pretreatment technology evaluation process are discussed in later sections of this Manual. Once the pretreatment system is selected, designed, and installed, the effluent from the pretreatment system should be monitored to meet discharge permit requirements and evaluate system performance (Step 10). The results of these evaluations can be used to optimize operations of the pretreatment system and can be fed back to help in the development of additional pretreatment process steps (Step 9) and source reduction options (Step 5). The evaluations can also help in the regular review and inventory of pollutant sources in the facility (Step 1).

This step-by-step approach to achieving discharge compliance can be an iterative process. Feedbacks during the source reduction, wastewater characterization, and pretreatment steps can dramatically affect the results. In particular situations, some of the above steps may be skipped or combined, and the order of some steps can be reversed. An experienced consulting engineering firm can provide invaluable services in the execution of this process. For more information, refer to the following sections of this Manual.


FIGURE 1

fig1.gif (8305 bytes)

 

RETURN TO PRETREATMENT MANUAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 

 
ABOUT MASCO, INC. :: AREA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
PARKING & TRANSPORTATION SERVICES :: COMMUTEWORKS ::  MASCO SERVICES, INC.
375 LONGWOOD AVE. :: COLLEGES OF THE FENWAY :: CHILD CARE CENTER
MERCURY WORK GROUP :: MASCO MEMBER INSTITUTIONS :: QUARTERLY UPDATE
DIRECTIONS :: THE LONGWOOD MEDICAL AND ACADEMIC AREA
SITE GUIDE :: CONTACT MASCO, INC. :: RETURN HOME

08/16/2006

Copyright © 2000 MASCO, Inc.
375 Longwood Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
Phone: 617-632-2310
Fax: 617-632-2759