Mercury Work Group
Phase I Reports  >>  Operations Report

Executive Summary | End-of-Pipe Report | Operations Report | Infrastructure Report

For more information, contact David Eppstein by email at
deppstein@masco.harvard.edu, or by calling 617-632-2860.

II. REAGENT IDENTIFICATION
 

Problem Definition:

At the outset of this Work Group process, many hospitals were unknowingly using and discharging mercury because they were not aware that certain products in use within their clinical and research procedures contained mercury. Given the similarity of the types of laboratory activities conducted by these institutions, this was perceived as a common problem with, potentially, a common solution. Chemical reagents, in particular, used with regularity in a wide range of laboratory testing, were suspected of being likely sources of mercury contamination.

The problem was compounded by the fact that the traditional methods of obtaining information on the composition of these products would prove to be inadequate. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), for example, are not required to list the hazardous components of a product unless that component is present at a level of 1% (0.1% for carcinogens). This means that a particular product could contain up to 10,000 parts per million of mercury before the manufacturer would have to alert the users of that fact. In addition, there has not been any significant pressure brought to bear to encourage vendors and suppliers to manufacture and market "mercury free" alternatives.

Approach:

In attempting to compile a comprehensive list of all products being used by the various facilities, a reagent identification survey was developed by the Subcommittee and distributed to the Membership (Appendix A). Each of the Member Hospitals and Institutions was asked to provide as much information as possible regarding the products in use within their facility and return the questionnaire to the MWRA for subsequent entry into a Master Database. Requested information included the facility name, the product manufacturer, supplier, the chemical name, the CAS (chemical abstract service) number, the approximate annual volume used, how the product was being managed (either haul or dump), where the product was being used (clinical, research, other), whether the mercury content had been checked (via MSDS, vendor or laboratory) and, if so, the results in ppb, and any other relevant comments. These categories were used as the foundation for the development of the Master Database discussed later in this Report.

In addition to the request for information solicited from the Membership, the Operations Subcommittee agreed that the vendors should be contacted directly and asked to provide complete information about their products (inclusive of the "purity" of the product component materials). Accordingly, a letter was sent to 153 different vendors seeking their assistance in addressing the environmental and compliance concerns facing the Member Hospitals and Institutions and the MWRA. A follow-up letter was also sent to reinforce the significance of this mercury issue and to establish a deadline for receipt of the requested information. The letters, as shown in Appendix B, listed the names of the Work Group participants and described EPA, MWRA, State and Local governmental involvement in the process as well as the prohibitions and enforcement actions currently in effect. The letters also requested that suppliers provide verification of product mercury content via the submission of a state certified laboratory report. Finally, requests were made of the vendors to include information on mercury free alternative products or materials wherever possible.

The Subcommittee's next challenge was to develop a means of compiling all of the information which would be collected. A database worksheet was provided to the Member Hospitals and Institutions for review and comment. Based on their input, the information was worked into the Database in a way that would allow the information fields to be manipulated by an individual facility to suit their own particular needs. Some of the information that can now be readily accessed includes: facility information; product name and CAS number; manufacturer and/or supplier; address; contact; phone number, disposal methods; laboratory where used; MSDS information; mercury concentration; and, comments. Several additional fields were also incorporated into the Database in anticipation of the need for future expansions or specialized manipulation of contained data. Though not currently used, these fields can be activated, as required.

In an attempt to maximize the value of the Database, seventy-five (75) of the most commonly used products within the Member Hospitals and Institutions were selected and samples of each were submitted to the MWRA Central Lab to be tested for mercury content (see Appendix C). The analysis results for these priority chemicals that have been generated by the MWRA lab thus far, is included as Appendix D. Due to the size of the overall Mercury Products Database, only that portion of it which contains those chemicals and products that have been verified, to date, to contain mercury at some level, has been included in Appendix E.

The entire Database is available to the general public through the MWRA and can be received in the following formats:

  1. Hg database in a dBase III Plus Format
  2. Hg database with the dBase III Plus Hg Application
  3. Hg database in ASCII Format

Findings:

Thus far, there have been 61 replies to the 153 vendors letters that were mailed and responses continue to arrive, though slowly. Vendor response has been varied and a spreadsheet, presented as Appendix F, provides a summary of the responses received to date.

A total of 5,504 entries have been recorded into the Master Database using both vendor and member responses to requests for information. The current statistics for the Database are as follows:

  1. Number of records that contain mercury data: 781

  2. Number of records with mercury concentrations below detection (BD): 166

  3. Number of records with mercury concentrations BD-1 ppb: 43

  4. Number of records with mercury concentrations 1-5 ppb: 53

  5. Number of records with mercury concentrations 5-10 ppb: 19

  6. Number of records with mercury concentrations > 10 ppb: 469

  7. Number of records under review of concentration data: 31

The information included in the present database is current as of June, 1995. The MWRA will endeavor to update the file periodically and updated disk copies will be sent out to the Member Hospitals and Institutions on a semi-annual basis. Eventually, the MWRA hopes to be able to distribute the Database information electronically via an on-line service. To facilitate this updating process, all Member Hospitals and Institutions should continue to provide mercury content information on products to the MWRA as it becomes available.

 

RETURN TO OPERATIONS REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
ABOUT MASCO, INC. :: AREA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
PARKING & TRANSPORTATION SERVICES :: COMMUTEWORKS ::  MASCO SERVICES, INC.
375 LONGWOOD AVE. :: COLLEGES OF THE FENWAY :: CHILD CARE CENTER
MERCURY WORK GROUP :: MASCO MEMBER INSTITUTIONS :: QUARTERLY UPDATE
DIRECTIONS :: THE LONGWOOD MEDICAL AND ACADEMIC AREA
SITE GUIDE :: CONTACT MASCO, INC. :: RETURN HOME

08/16/2006

Copyright © 2000 MASCO, Inc.
375 Longwood Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
Phone: 617-632-2310
Fax: 617-632-2759